martes, 31 de mayo de 2016

The Venus





Name : The Birth Of Venus.
Author : Botticelli.
Year : 1484-1486.
Style : The First Renaissance.
Technique : Painted in tempera.
Location : Uffizi Gallery.



INTRODUCTION

The painting is called , The Venus of Botticelli or The Birth of Venus , and it was made between 1484 and 1486 by Sandro Botticelli. In this painting you can appreciate many common aspects from the period in when the painting was made , as the idealization of classical beauty , that appears also in The Gioconda , that is one of the most famous paintings in this period , and also the perfection of the bodies and faces.
The author was born in 1445 and he was called Alessandro di Mariano di Vanni Filipepi, in Florence. He was called before Botticelli, because his brothers sold tonnels and in Italian Botticelli means that.
He belong to the Quattrocento, and he obtained fame because the Vespucci and Medici family asked him to made some works for them, like this painting.Finally in 1510 he died in Florence, with a lot of works after him.


ANALYSIS 

This painting was ordered by Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco one of the Medici family , and it was for a house in the countryside , that were normally with mithology of Ancient Romans. Botticelli by one sculpture of Venus that was in one of The Medici family house:

In the painting appear four characters, the Venus is the most important , here is represented her birth and you can appreciate that she is adult but in her legend they said that she was born adult , and in the paint also appear two god that are Cefiro and Cloris , who impulse with the wind Venus to the coast where a "Hora" is waiting for cover her with a cape decored with flowers which represents the Spring when she was born and from the "Hora" is from , and this represents the new begginning. Also you may see that a lot of roses are flying after Venus , because the legend said that she brought the roses to The Earth.
The Venus was represented by Simoneta Vespucci , who was part of the family of Americo Vespucci , and she participate in most of the Medici works. She was got fame because of her family. 
This painting was made in tempera , and its support was a canvas , like for example in Gioconda.
There is a little perspective of depth , but is not as notticed as in the school of Athens , where you can appreciate very well that.
There is a dark zone that is in the part of the coast where Venus is coming, and it central zone Botticelli wanted to add more light, so it is supposed that Venus is going to add light to the people when she arrive , so you can see also that is not a Catholic or Christian painting.
The color are very soft and fair , also you can see that Venus seem s to be made of pearl or marble , so with this details you can see that here Botticelli wanted to represent that Venus was going to put our world in golden and very colorfull way to make it beauty.
The composition is with triangle shape , symmetric and dynamic.
It function is not well determined, because the work was made, as many people said, for the Medici, so they thought that is was for a house of the family, and it is mainly for decoration.
The figures of this painting , seem really idealised, and it is normal from this period of time because this is the part in when the idealism and serenity was mixed based on the ideas of Ancient Greek philosophers. As for example The Gioconda made by da Vinci.
In this period the paintings reflected a new mentality, for example this painting was the reopening of the nudes of womans after the ones of Eva, so it is very impressive. And then they wanted to search balance and proportion , and they used the pyramidal composition adding symmetrical aspects, in normal cases, but Michelangelo changed that in many of this works.







CONCLUSION

In this period there where many important works by other people as the Gioconda or The piety.














In my opinion this painting is very good, because it added many importance to the woman, and also it added a new way to represent beauty, with a woman. Also it is interesting to see how the author added light and  comparing it to the Gioconda, or the different colours used between these paintings, because in the one of da Vinci he used very dark colours and in the Venus there are very fair colours, so there are huge differences between the authors in this period. I can also add that for my this paint is very beautiful and I love the way how the woman is represented, as a glorious shape, and with no defects, so I think it was a good point for this painting, because in those periods it was very strange to  adore a woman, so I was very impressed to see it, because in my opinion the Gioconda was made to laugh about the ideal of beauty, beacuse she has no brows and she seem a bit strange, so I was thankful to this work.

THE GIOCONDA

 GIOCONDA




INTRODUCTION
Tittle:Gioconda.
Author:Leonardo Da Vinci.
Style:Italian Renaissance.
Timeline: 1503-1519.

ANALYSIS
Technical and support  of frame is oil on panel.The combination of aerial perspective and technique sfumatto get a great three-dimensional sense of depth.Contrast between light and shadow. Much clarity and bright light in the features of the Gioconda.They are gray and blue hues to emphasize remoteness and create an atmospheric effect,dark greenish brown hues for the hair and clothing and light yellow hue and shone in the rest of the skin.There symmetry, the composition is balanced.The function of this work is decorative and is in the Louvre.Leonardo is not intended to portray only in a superficial way, but wants to emerge feelings and soul, and it succeeds.The official title of the work is Gioconda, which is justified because Giocondo was the name of the husband of the sitter, Lisa Gherardini.
This work belongs to the Renaissance and the stage of the Cinquecento.

CONCLUSION
La Gioconda is the most important in the world of painting work, I like this painting because it has much to tell. Its author Leonardo Da Vinci is one of the most important authors of the Renaissance.
 

Italian Renaissance Architecture

SAN LORENZO

 



INTRODUCTION


Title:San Lorenzo.

Architect:Brunelleschi.

Style: Renaissance.

Chronology and historical context: ‎1418-1470.




DESCRIPTION


It is a church that it is in Florencia.The materials used are stone and marble for construction.

The interior columns are of sandstone conglomerates.The ceiling decorated with gilded.

Brunelleschi created a Latin cross in lengthwise.There is a dome on the cruise and ribbed vaults in the roofs of the lateral naves.In the corridors there arches on columns.its function is regular cult.

It is Renaissance style because its author is of the Renaissance and the building meets the characteristics of renaissance.It is of style Quatrocento.The most important were Filippo Brunelleschi and Leon Battista Alberti.The Most important work of Alberti is the church of San Andres de Mantua.




CONCLUSION

This building remains a very distinctive style as the Renaissance, belongs to the stage of Quatrocentto.

I liked analyze this building because its interior has many details of the Renaissance.

And the author is a great architect,is Brunelleschi and one of the most important in this stage as Alberti.






Santa María Novella by Alberti









Name = Santa María Novella

Author = Leon Battista Alberti

Year = 1490

Style = Gothic-Renaissance

Location = Florence, Italy



INTRODUCTION


The front of the basilica was made by Alberti. The basilica is in Florence, Italy. The front of the basilica was end in the year 1490. The style of the basilica is gothic but the style of the front is renaissance



ANALYSIS


Alberti was a very important artist of the quattrocento some of his most important works were: palace of the Rucellai’s family and the the front of basilica of Santa María Novella. The quattrocento was an important period of time during the 1400’s this period of time started in Florence, Italy by the Medici’s family


CONCLUSION

In my opinion the front of the basilica is a very beautiful work of Alberti and is a good place to visit if you travel to Italy.

martes, 24 de mayo de 2016

Dome of Florence



Name: The Dome of Florence
Author : Brunelleschi
Year : 1471
Style : Gothical - Renacentist 
Location : Florence

INTRODUCTION

Its name is The Dome Of Florence and it was designed by Brunelleschi . It was finiched in the year 1471 and its construction leasted 25 years .


ANALYSIS 

It is a part from a cathedral , the Cathedral of Florence and its materials were mainly by bricks , wood , stone and metal . 
It is from the phase of the Quattrocento (15th century ) you can notice it because of the harmony and proprortion between this period and the middle age . For example in this period they started using the lines used by ancinet Greeks and Romans and they added simple and proportionated elements .
also you can notice it because of the main fastors that made this kind of architecture important were the simplicity (they used very few decorative features), the open spaces (squares)and proportion.
It is an enormus dome , with some bricks in the ceiling in colour orange and some in white . In the inside of the dome there are many paintings of the Last Trial made by Vasari and Zuccaro, which are ones of the most biggest in the world . 
In other hand we had this dome divided by some bricks in white and some greens mixed with whites in its base , making diferent colours and very different from the others .
In the Cathedral we can apreciate a Latin Cross plan  , with 3 naves . It also have pointed arches .
We are talking about the principal doem , but we can see that are many chepels with more domes and different desing .
In the lower part there is a vault where many bishops were buried , but between 1965 and 1974it was discovere includedvault of Brunelleschi , and you can apreciate the value that they gave to him.
 The inside of its dome its illuminated by some big windows in circular form .
It function is a normal Cathedral , you can have mass and also visit it , and it is one of the most bigger Cathedrals in the world with a capability of  30.000 people .

Another peaces important from this period was the palace of the Rucellai family



CONCLUSION

This cathedral in my opinion is very beautiful and it is also impressive , because I could visit it in the past and I before it I hadn´t saw something like that , and I think that I was very lucky because many people haven´t been  there and are older than me , also I can say that there are more impressive monuments , so it is beautiful but if you are only going to do one trip in your life you should look another place maybe . So as I was saying it is fantastic and I recommend you to visit it , but maybe another place is better to you .